Thursday, July 15, 2010

Some housekeeping




Hello little monsters! I'm just doing some housekeeping before we continue our discussion on Devil in the White City. Regina and I have had some engaging and scintillating conversations about Holmes, the Fair, Chicago and Orpah's role in all of this (only joking on the last part, although our conversation did segue to Oprah having her show on the Miracle Mile).

I think that we should choose our next book. I know that Mom is reading Pride & Prejudice right now, which I'm into reading, if everyone else is. If not, I was thinking that the next book we queue up should be either Atonement or Middlesex.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Although I just started reading this book, I am already engaged. The prologue and the quotes from the main characters added an interesting preview effect. I enjoyed the Horseshoe Curve connection and the comment on the decaying morals of the 1890s. That must happen every decade.

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Quick Thoughts

My last post was really long, so feel free to avoid it and just skim over these more basic thoughts:

Other things:
  • There's a clear idea of appearance vs. reality throughout the novel. How Burnham envisions the fair and how it really appears. How Holmes appears to public and the reality of his antics. On a larger level, you can see Chicago struggling, as well, to appear as a great American city to its rival New York, while also faced with the city that it really is pre-Fair (I suspect this will change). Anyway, this quote kind of sums up this thought procress for me. "Later, no doubt, he wishes he had been more candid and had listened more closely to the whisper in his head about the wrongness of that building and the discontinuity between its true appearance and Emeline's perception of it" (166).
  • Also, I like the idea of Chicago's legacy that comes from producing a marvel like this Fair, and producing a sadistic serial killer like Holmes.
Quick Thoughts:
  • Is anyone else annoyed with Olmsted?
  • What about Holmes' 'woman problem'? Isn't he someone I would completely fall for?
  • I really get into Holmes' story. I wish we could explore his pysche a little more.
  • I like that Larson parallels Holmes' and Burnham's insatiable need for complete and utter power and control over everyone's thoughts and perceptions. What an interesting pairing and doubling. Very Jekyll and Hyde.
  • I will never forget the origin of PBR again.

Cracks in the Foundation

I just started reading Devil in the White City, and other than learning a lot about real, true history, it's also a gripping story. (I should preface this by saying that during my first semester of grad school I had to do a presentation on the World's Fair, and I don't remember one thing I learned, but I killed--Everyone thought I was really funny).

Anyway, I have a few quick thoughts--things that I find interesting so far--and I'm curious to see what everyone else thinks. Maybe some future discussion points.

Not only is the novel well-researched, but Larson has found a way to intertwine the stories and juxtapose Burnham's construction of the World's Fair against Holmes construction of his "death hotel," so to speak.

Buildings, like writing a story, provide many interpretations, especially when thinking about the idea/concept of what a solid foundation (or at least one that appears solid) really means. I think that as the toil and prep for the Fair continues, Burnham and his team of architects and engineers will be faced with a proliferation of problems, especially with structure, aesthetics and strong edifices. In fact, it looks like the failures that the Fair's buildings face foreshadow the failed structure of Holmes' less sound foundation (his mental state, his tangled web of lies, his "hotel," etc.). I think this will definitely be a good metaphor as the book progresses to see how Chicago flourishes after the fair while Holmes, I assume, doesn't.

In grad school, we learned about how, basically, human existence and the concept of truth is based on a lie because of this convoluted, tangled web we created based on false language, history, etc. Anyway, we tell ourselves that this is true. We build more lies on top of this faulty structure in order to not only explain our own existence but also to continually reproduce it. So we continue living because we buy into the lie that man, truth, language--all this stuff is really real, tangible things, when they're not. It's confusing, I know, but on it's basic level, it is kind of interesting if we think about this abstract idea in terms of the novel.

So, that's why I'm fascinated with the actual architecture of the Fair, Holmes and the novel itself.

Monday, June 14, 2010

I'm just testing out the blogging waters here and to also show Alissa that I will actually post things....I'm really excited about this.

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Nerd Alert: Part 1

So, I'm trying to figure out all this blog business, but until then I'm going to repost the list of books that we (Regina and I, actually) came up with that we can all read. There's no syllabus, and there are no real rules--this is total anarchy, which is how I choose to live.

Andy already started Devil in the White City, and I'm 60 pages into Crime and Punishment, which is not on the list, I just wanted to brag. So, here it is with two new additions courtesy of Regina Zanzuccki-Ponchione.


1. Where Men Find Glory - Jon Krakauer

--The story of Pat Tilman and the lies the government used to exploit his death.
--I hesitate to include this since I'm reading it now, but it's such a great read and would spark so much intelligent discussion that I can't not include it.

2. The House of Mirth - Edith Wharton
--I loved The Age of Innocence, and Wharton has a wonderful writing style. I'm not sure what this book is about, but it's safe to assume it has to do about social expectations in New York society.

3. The Robber Bride - Margaret Atwood; Also consider Oryx and Crake, it's one of her most famous novels but also a sci-fi book
--Atwood is one of my favorite authors so this is a selfish request. The Robber Bride was made into a movie recently, and the premise seems to be both mysterious and intriguing about three women the college friend they all know who has betrayed them yet brings them together (I think. I just make this stuff up, mostly).

4. War - Sebastian Junger
--This is a nonfiction novel about the war in Afghanistan.

5. The Glass Castle - Jeannette Walls

--A memoir about Walls' relationship with her dysfunctional family (of course).

6. Winesburg, Ohio - Sherweood Anderson
--A collection of stories about interrelated characters in this Ohio town.

7. On the Beach Nevil Shute
--I read this book in middle school, and it truly was one I never forgot. It's about life in a post-apocalyptic world.

8. Night - Elie Wiesel

--A young adult novel yet a gripping one about his experience in concentration camps.

**9. Devil in the White City - Erik Larson
--My vote for the first book we read. It's a non fiction story about a murder at the Chicago World's Fair.

10. Atonement - Ian McEwan

--I haven't seen this movie, and my experience with McEwan is tepid at best. He's an evocative writer but it seems that some of his stories hinge on his language opposed to having any plot development or a plot at all. But he's well-respected and highly regarded as one of the best writers of our time, not to mention he hid Salman Rushdie while the fatwa was on his head.

11. Gilead - Marilynne Robinson

--This won the Pultizer in 2004, but I'm copy and pasting the description from wikipedia. "The novel is the fictional autobiography of the Reverend John Ames, an elderly congregationalist pastor in the small, secluded town of Gilead, Iowa who knows that he is dying of a heart condition. At the beginning of the book, the date is established as 1956, and Ames explains that he is writing an account of his life for his 7-year-old son, who will have few memories of him as an adult."

12. Middlesex - Jeffrey Eugenides

--He wrote the Virgin Suicides, which was an engrossing novel about sisters who killed themselves. I'm not sure what Middlesex is about specifically but it has something to do with ambiguous gender; this also won the Pulitzer.
"The narrator and protagonist, Cal Stephanides (initially called "Callie"), is an intersexed person of Greek descent. He has 5-alpha-reductase deficiency which causes him to appear female. The first half of the novel is about Cal's Greek family, depicting his grandparents' migration from a small village in Asia Minor to the United States in 1922, and their assimilation into American society. The latter half of the novel, set in the late 20th century, focuses on Cal's story in Detroit, Michigan."

13. Tinkers - Paul Harding

--This is the most recent Pulitzer Prize winner--if you can't tell, I went to the Pulitzer web site...so transparent. Anyway, here's the synopsis: he novel tells the tale of George Washington Crosby, a clock repairman, who recounts his life story and his father's struggles with epilepsy to his family on his deathbed."

14. What is the What - Dave Eggers/A heartbreaking work of staggering genius
--The former is about the Lost Boys of Africa. The latter is a memoir of his life. Dave Eggers is a really effing amazing, btw.

15. Blood Meridian - Cormac McCarthy
--It isn't even hyperbole when I say McCarthy is a living genius, someone who deserves all the adulation and awards. I think his writing is so succinct yet captures the struggles of his characters so well. His writing style, for me at least, is reminiscent of Hemingway.

16. Kavalier and Clay - Michael Chabon
--Chabon is from Pittsburgh and wrote "the mysteries of pittsburgh" and "wonder boys." This novel, believe or not, won the Pulitzer as well. A big complaint about Chabon is that his novels are hard to get into, but once you do, you can't put it down.

17. Pride and Prejudice - Jane Austen
--Regina wants to read Jane Austen, and she's right. This book is great for a variety of reasons. It's funny (in an 18th century way), smart and highlights some great (and irritating) female characters.

18. To Kill A Mockingbird - Harper Lee
--I think that this book is actually celebrating a pretty prominent anniversary this year, and a quick google search suggests that it's been 40 years (!) since this was first published. Boo Radley! Atticus! Scout! Let's do this.


Please look this over with thoughts, suggestions, criticism and anything else you want to add. I'm really hoping that everyone has time to contribute to this, sparking intelligent discussion and, most importantly, an air of superiority and elitism.